07-05 — Line Integrals
Phase: 7 — Calculus IV: Vector Calculus Subject: 07-05 Prerequisites: 07-04 — Vector Fields, parametric curves (Phase 5), single-variable integration (Phase 4) Next subject: 07-06 — Green's Theorem
Learning Objectives
By the end of this subject, you will be able to:
- Compute scalar line integrals ∫_C f ds for functions along curves, representing arc length, mass of a wire, or other accumulated quantities
- Compute vector line integrals ∫_C F · dr representing work done by a force field along a path
- Parametrize curves in 2D and 3D and express line integrals in terms of the parameter t
- Apply the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals (FTLI) to evaluate line integrals of conservative vector fields effortlessly
- Determine path independence and recognize when a line integral depends only on the endpoints
Core Content
1. Scalar Line Integrals (with respect to arc length)
⚠️ CRITICAL FOUNDATION: Line integrals ∫_C F · dr compute work done by a force along a path. The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals (FTLI) says that for conservative fields, the integral depends only on endpoints: ∫_C ∇f · dr = f(end) - f(start).
Given a scalar function f(x, y) and a curve C, the scalar line integral is:
$∫_C f(x, y) ds $
Where ds is the arc length element.
Interpretation: - If f = 1: ∫_C 1 ds = arc length of C - If f is density of a wire: ∫_C f ds = mass of the wire - If f is height above xy-plane, ∫_C f ds = area of the "curtain" above C
Computation: Parametrize the curve C as r(t) = ⟨x(t), y(t)⟩ for t ∈ [a, b]. Then:
$ds = |r'(t)| dt = √(x'(t)² + y'(t)²) dt ∫_C f(x, y) ds = ∫_a^b f(x(t), y(t)) · √(x'(t)² + y'(t)²) dt $
For 3D curves: r(t) = ⟨x(t), y(t), z(t)⟩.
$ds = √(x'(t)² + y'(t)² + z'(t)²) dt $
Example 1: Evaluate ∫_C (x + y) ds where C is the line segment from (0, 0) to (1, 2).
$Parametrize: r(t) = ⟨t, 2t⟩, t ∈ [0, 1]. r'(t) = ⟨1, 2⟩. |r'(t)| = √(1 + 4) = √5. x(t) + y(t) = t + 2t = 3t. ∫_C (x+y) ds = ∫₀¹ 3t · √5 dt = 3√5 [t²/2]₀¹ = (3√5)/2. $
Example 2: Find the mass of a wire in the shape of the helix r(t) = ⟨cos t, sin t, t⟩ for t ∈ [0, 4π] with density f(x, y, z) = x² + y² + z.
$r'(t) = ⟨−sin t, cos t, 1⟩. |r'(t)| = √(sin²t + cos²t + 1) = √2.
f = cos²t + sin²t + t = 1 + t.
Mass = ∫₀^{4π} (1 + t)√2 dt = √2 [t + t²/2]₀^{4π}
= √2 (4π + 8π²) = 4√2 π(1 + 2π).
$
2. Vector Line Integrals (Work Integrals)
Given a vector field F and a curve C, the vector line integral is:
$∫_C F · dr = ∫_C P dx + Q dy (2D) ∫_C F · dr = ∫_C P dx + Q dy + R dz (3D) $
Interpretation: If F is a force field, ∫_C F · dr is the work done by F in moving a particle along C.
Computation: Parametrize C as r(t) for t ∈ [a, b]. Then dr = r'(t) dt, and:
$∫_C F · dr = ∫_a^b F(r(t)) · r'(t) dt $
In 2D component form:
$∫_C P dx + Q dy = ∫_a^b [P(x(t), y(t)) x'(t) + Q(x(t), y(t)) y'(t)] dt $
Arbitrariness of parametrization: The line integral ∫_C F · dr depends on the orientation (direction) of C. Reversing the direction changes the sign. But it does NOT depend on the particular parametrization (as long as orientation is preserved).
Example 3: Find the work done by F(x, y) = ⟨x², −xy⟩ along the quarter-circle x² + y² = 4 from (2, 0) to (0, 2).
$Parametrize: r(t) = ⟨2 cos t, 2 sin t⟩, t ∈ [0, π/2].
r'(t) = ⟨−2 sin t, 2 cos t⟩.
F(r(t)) = ⟨4 cos²t, −4 cos t sin t⟩.
F · r' = (4 cos²t)(−2 sin t) + (−4 cos t sin t)(2 cos t)
= −8 cos²t sin t − 8 cos²t sin t = −16 cos²t sin t.
Work = ∫₀^{π/2} −16 cos²t sin t dt.
Let u = cos t, du = −sin t dt. Limits: t=0→u=1, t=π/2→u=0.
= ∫₁⁰ −16 u² (−du) = ∫₁⁰ 16u² du = [16u³/3]₁⁰ = 0 − 16/3 = −16/3.
The negative work means the field opposes the motion (on net).
$
3. The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals (FTLI)
Theorem: If F is a conservative vector field with potential function φ (i.e., F = ∇φ) and C is a smooth curve from point A to point B, then:
$∫_C F · dr = φ(B) − φ(A) $
The line integral depends ONLY on the endpoints, not on the path. This is the multi-dimensional analog of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
Proof sketch:
$∫_C ∇φ · dr = ∫_a^b ∇φ(r(t)) · r'(t) dt
= ∫_a^b (d/dt)[φ(r(t))] dt (chain rule!)
= φ(r(b)) − φ(r(a))
= φ(B) − φ(A)
$
Consequences: 1. ∫_C F · dr is path-independent for conservative fields 2. ∮_C F · dr = 0 for any closed curve C (since φ(B) = φ(A)) 3. If F is conservative, you never need to parametrize — just find φ and evaluate at endpoints
Example 4: Evaluate ∫_C F · dr where F(x, y) = ⟨2xy, x²⟩ from (0, 0) to (1, 2) along any path.
$Check: ∂P/∂y = 2x, ∂Q/∂x = 2x. Conservative! Find φ: φ = ∫ 2xy dx = x²y + g(y). ∂φ/∂y = x² + g'(y) = x² → g'(y) = 0 → g(y) = C. φ = x²y + C. ∫_C F · dr = φ(1, 2) − φ(0, 0) = 1²·2 − 0 = 2. No parametrization needed! The answer is 2 regardless of path. $
4. Path Independence
A line integral ∫_C F · dr is path-independent if it depends only on the endpoints of C.
Equivalently (on a connected domain): - F is conservative (∃ φ with F = ∇φ) - ∮_C F · dr = 0 for all closed curves C - The cross-partial condition holds and the domain is simply connected
Example 5 — Verifying path independence: Compute ∫_C ⟨y, x⟩ · dr from (0, 0) to (1, 1) along two different paths and verify they match.
$Path 1: Straight line r(t) = ⟨t, t⟩, t ∈ [0, 1]. r'(t) = ⟨1, 1⟩. F(r(t)) = ⟨t, t⟩. F·r' = t + t = 2t. ∫₀¹ 2t dt = [t²]₀¹ = 1. Path 2: Parabola y = x². r(t) = ⟨t, t²⟩, t ∈ [0, 1]. r'(t) = ⟨1, 2t⟩. F(r(t)) = ⟨t², t⟩. F·r' = t² + 2t² = 3t². ∫₀¹ 3t² dt = [t³]₀¹ = 1. ✓ φ = xy, so φ(1,1) − φ(0,0) = 1 − 0 = 1. ✓ $
5. Connecting Notation: P dx + Q dy
The expression P dx + Q dy is called a differential form. If F = ⟨P, Q⟩ is conservative (F = ∇φ), then:
$P dx + Q dy = (∂φ/∂x) dx + (∂φ/∂y) dy = dφ (the exact differential of φ) $
A differential form P dx + Q dy is exact if it equals dφ for some φ. The condition ∂P/∂y = ∂Q/∂x is necessary (and on simply-connected domains, sufficient) for exactness.
Common Misconceptions
-
"Line integrals always require parametrization." Only if the field is non-conservative. For conservative fields, use FTLI.
-
"The line integral depends on which parametrization you use." It depends on orientation (reversing flips sign), but any parametrization preserving orientation gives the same value.
-
"∮ F·dr = 0 means F is conservative everywhere." It must be zero for ALL closed curves, not just some. A field can have zero circulation around some loops but not others if the domain has holes.
-
"Scalar and vector line integrals are the same." Scalar: ∫ f ds (no direction, ds = |r'|dt). Vector: ∫ F·dr (direction matters, dr = r' dt, no absolute value).
Key Terms
- Equivalently
Worked Examples
Example 1: Scalar Line Integral — Mass of a Wire
Problem: A wire is bent into a semicircle y = √(1 − x²) from (−1, 0) to (1, 0). The linear density is ρ(x, y) = x². Find its mass.
Solution:
$Parametrize: r(t) = ⟨cos t, sin t⟩, t ∈ [0, π]. r'(t) = ⟨−sin t, cos t⟩. |r'(t)| = √(sin²t + cos²t) = 1. ρ(x(t), y(t)) = cos²t. Mass = ∫_C x² ds = ∫₀^π cos²t · 1 dt = ∫₀^π (1 + cos 2t)/2 dt = [t/2 + sin(2t)/4]₀^π = π/2 + 0 = π/2. $
Example 2: Vector Line Integral — Work
Problem: Evaluate ∫_C F · dr where F(x, y) = ⟨x²y, xy²⟩ and C is the triangle from (0,0) to (1,0) to (0,1) back to (0,0).
Solution:
C consists of three segments. Let's compute each.
C₁: from (0,0) to (1,0). r(t) = ⟨t, 0⟩, t ∈ [0, 1].
r'(t) = ⟨1, 0⟩. F = ⟨t²·0, t·0⟩ = ⟨0, 0⟩.
∫_C₁ F·dr = 0.
C₂: from (1,0) to (0,1). r(t) = ⟨1−t, t⟩, t ∈ [0, 1].
r'(t) = ⟨−1, 1⟩.
F = ⟨(1−t)²t, (1−t)t²⟩ = ⟨t(1−t)², t²(1−t)⟩.
F·r' = −t(1−t)² + t²(1−t) = (1−t)[−t(1−t) + t²] = (1−t)[−t + t² + t²]
= (1−t)(2t² − t) = (2t² − t) − (2t³ − t²) = −2t³ + 3t² − t.
∫₀¹ (−2t³ + 3t² − t) dt = [−t⁴/2 + t³ − t²/2]₀¹ = −1/2 + 1 − 1/2 = 0.
C₃: from (0,1) to (0,0). r(t) = ⟨0, 1−t⟩, t ∈ [0, 1].
r'(t) = ⟨0, −1⟩. F = ⟨0, 0⟩ (since x=0).
∫_C₃ F·dr = 0.
Total: 0 + 0 + 0 = 0.
Check: is F conservative? P = x²y, Q = xy².
∂P/∂y = x², ∂Q/∂x = y². Not equal (unless x² = y²). Not conservative.
But work around this triangle is still 0 — that doesn't mean the field is conservative;
it means this particular closed path happens to have zero circulation. To be conservative,
work must be zero for ALL closed paths.
Example 3: FTLI Application
Problem: Evaluate ∫_C (2x + y) dx + (x + 2y) dy from (1, 0) to (0, 1) along any path.
Solution:
$P = 2x + y, Q = x + 2y. ∂P/∂y = 1, ∂Q/∂x = 1. Conservative! Find φ: φ = ∫ (2x + y) dx = x² + xy + g(y). ∂φ/∂y = x + g'(y) = x + 2y → g'(y) = 2y → g(y) = y² + C. φ = x² + xy + y² + C. By FTLI: ∫_C F·dr = φ(0, 1) − φ(1, 0) = (0+0+1) − (1+0+0) = 1 − 1 = 0. So the integral is 0 regardless of path. $
Quiz
Q1: The line integral ∫_C F · dr computes:
A) The arc length of the curve C B) The work done by the force field F along the curve C C) The area under the curve C D) The flux of F across C
Correct: B)
- If you chose B: ∫_C F · dr = ∫_C P dx + Q dy computes work — the integral of the tangential component of force along the path. Correct!
- If you chose A: Arc length is ∫_C 1 ds = ∫_C ‖r′(t)‖ dt, not F · dr.
- If you chose C: Area is a double integral, not a line integral.
- If you chose D: Flux is ∫_C F · n ds (normal component), not F · dr (tangential).
Q2: To evaluate ∫_C F · dr, you parametrize C as r(t) for a ≤ t ≤ b and compute:
A) ∫_a^b F(r(t)) dt B) ∫_a^b F(r(t)) · r′(t) dt C) ∫_a^b F(r(t)) · r(t) dt D) ∫_a^b ‖F(r(t))‖ ‖r′(t)‖ dt
Correct: B)
- If you chose B: dr = r′(t) dt, so ∫_C F · dr = ∫_a^b F(r(t)) · r′(t) dt. Correct!
- If you chose A: Missing the r′(t) factor — F alone doesn't give the differential.
- If you chose C: Dotting with r(t) instead of the derivative r′(t).
- If you chose D: This would give ∫_C ‖F‖ ds (scalar line integral of magnitude), not the work integral.
Q3: The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals states that if F = ∇f, then:
A) ∫_C F · dr = 0 for all curves B) ∫_C F · dr = f(r(b)) − f(r(a)) C) ∫_C F · dr = f(r(a)) + f(r(b)) D) ∫_C F · dr = ‖∇f‖ · length(C)
Correct: B)
- If you chose B: For conservative fields, the line integral equals the potential difference between endpoints — path independent! Correct!
- If you chose A: Only true for closed curves in conservative fields.
- If you chose C: It's the difference, not the sum.
- If you chose D: This would only be true if F is constant along C and parallel to it.
Q4: Which of the following implies that ∫_C F · dr is independent of the path between two points?
A) F is continuous B) F has constant magnitude C) F is conservative (F = ∇f) D) The curve C is a straight line
Correct: C)
- If you chose C: Path independence is the defining property of conservative fields — only then does FTLI apply. Correct!
- If you chose A: Continuity alone doesn't guarantee path independence.
- If you chose B: Constant magnitude is unrelated to path independence.
- If you chose D: The curve shape doesn't matter — only the field's conservativity does.
Q5: For F = ⟨y, x⟩, evaluate ∫_C F · dr where C is the line segment from (0, 0) to (1, 1).
A) 0 B) 1 C) 2 D) √2
Correct: B)
- If you chose B: Parametrize: r(t) = ⟨t, t⟩, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1. r′(t) = ⟨1, 1⟩. F(r(t)) = ⟨t, t⟩. F · r′ = t + t = 2t. ∫₀¹ 2t dt = 1. Correct!
- If you chose A: The integral is nonzero — work is done.
- If you chose C: That's 2t evaluated at 1 without integrating.
- If you chose D: That's the arc length of the segment, not the work.
Q6: The scalar line integral ∫_C f(x, y) ds (with respect to arc length) uses:
A) ds = dt B) ds = ‖r′(t)‖ dt C) ds = r′(t) dt D) ds = ‖r(t)‖ dt
Correct: B)
- If you chose B: The arc length differential is ds = ‖r′(t)‖ dt = √(x′(t)² + y′(t)²) dt. Correct!
- If you chose A: This would only work if the curve is parametrized by arc length.
- If you chose C: ds is scalar, not a vector like dr.
- If you chose D: Uses position magnitude instead of derivative magnitude.
Practice Problems
(Answers are below. Try each problem before checking.)
Problem 1: Evaluate ∫_C xy ds where C is the line segment from (0, 0) to (1, 1).
Problem 2: Find the work done by F(x, y) = ⟨x, y⟩ along the parabola y = x² from (0, 0) to (1, 1).
Problem 3: Evaluate ∫_C (x² dx + y² dy) where C is the arc of the circle x² + y² = 4 from (2, 0) to (0, 2). Is this field conservative? Can you use FTLI?
Problem 4: For F(x, y) = ⟨e^x cos y, −e^x sin y⟩, verify it is conservative, find φ, and evaluate ∫_C F·dr along any path from (0, 0) to (1, π/2).
Problem 5: Compute the arc length of the helix r(t) = ⟨cos t, sin t, t⟩ from t = 0 to t = 2π.
Problem 6: Evaluate ∮_C (y dx − x dy) where C is the unit circle x² + y² = 1 traversed counterclockwise.
Problem 7: For F(x, y) = ⟨x², xy⟩, compute ∫_C F·dr along the line segment from (0,0) to (1,1) and along the path r(t) = ⟨t², t⟩ from t=0 to t=1. Are they equal? Why or why not?
Answers (click to expand)
**Problem 1:** C: r(t) = ⟨t, t⟩, t ∈ [0, 1]. r'(t) = ⟨1, 1⟩. |r'| = √2. f = t·t = t². ∫₀¹ t² √2 dt = √2 [t³/3]₀¹ = √2/3. **Problem 2:** r(t) = ⟨t, t²⟩, t ∈ [0, 1]. r'(t) = ⟨1, 2t⟩. F(r(t)) = ⟨t, t²⟩. F·r' = t·1 + t²·2t = t + 2t³. Work = ∫₀¹ (t + 2t³) dt = [t²/2 + t⁴/2]₀¹ = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. (Check with FTLI: F = ⟨x,y⟩ = ∇(x²/2 + y²/2). φ(1,1) − φ(0,0) = (1/2+1/2) − 0 = 1. ✓) **Problem 3:** C: r(t) = ⟨2 cos t, 2 sin t⟩, t ∈ [0, π/2]. r'(t) = ⟨−2 sin t, 2 cos t⟩. F = ⟨(2 cos t)², (2 sin t)²⟩ = ⟨4 cos²t, 4 sin²t⟩. F·r' = −8 cos²t sin t + 8 sin²t cos t = 8 cos t sin t(sin t − cos t). This is messy. FTLI approach: F = ⟨x², y²⟩. ∂P/∂y = 0, ∂Q/∂x = 0. Conservative! φ = x³/3 + y³/3. φ(0,2) − φ(2,0) = 8/3 − 8/3 = 0. **Problem 4:** P = e^x cos y, Q = −e^x sin y. ∂P/∂y = −e^x sin y, ∂Q/∂x = −e^x sin y. Equal → conservative. φ = ∫ e^x cos y dx = e^x cos y + g(y). ∂φ/∂y = −e^x sin y + g'(y) = −e^x sin y → g'(y) = 0 → g(y) = C. φ = e^x cos y + C. ∫_C F·dr = φ(1, π/2) − φ(0, 0) = e¹ cos(π/2) − e⁰ cos(0) = e·0 − 1·1 = −1. **Problem 5:** r'(t) = ⟨−sin t, cos t, 1⟩. |r'(t)| = √(sin²t + cos²t + 1) = √2. Arc length = ∫₀^{2π} √2 dt = 2π√2. **Problem 6:** C: r(t) = ⟨cos t, sin t⟩, t ∈ [0, 2π]. r'(t) = ⟨−sin t, cos t⟩. F(r(t)) = ⟨sin t, −cos t⟩ (since y=sin t, x=cos t). F·r' = (sin t)(−sin t) + (−cos t)(cos t) = −sin²t − cos²t = −1. ∮ = ∫₀^{2π} (−1) dt = −2π. (Note: F = ⟨y, −x⟩. ∂P/∂y = 1, ∂Q/∂x = −1. Not conservative, so nonzero circulation is expected.) **Problem 7:** Path 1: r(t) = ⟨t, t⟩, t ∈ [0, 1]. r' = ⟨1, 1⟩. F = ⟨t², t²⟩. F·r' = 2t². ∫₀¹ 2t² dt = 2/3. Path 2: r(t) = ⟨t², t⟩, t ∈ [0, 1]. r' = ⟨2t, 1⟩. F = ⟨t⁴, t³⟩. F·r' = 2t⁵ + t³. ∫₀¹ (2t⁵ + t³) dt = [t⁶/3 + t⁴/4]₀¹ = 1/3 + 1/4 = 7/12. 2/3 ≠ 7/12. They are NOT equal because F is not conservative: ∂P/∂y = ∂(x²)/∂y = 0, ∂Q/∂x = ∂(xy)/∂x = y. 0 ≠ y (unless y = 0).Summary
- Scalar line integrals ∫_C f ds accumulate scalar quantities (mass, arc length) along a curve and are computed using ds = |r'(t)| dt — they do not depend on the orientation of C
- Vector line integrals ∫_C F · dr compute work done by a force field along a path and depend on orientation (direction) of C; they are evaluated by parametrizing and computing ∫ F(r(t)) · r'(t) dt
- The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals states that for conservative fields F = ∇φ, the line integral equals φ(endpoint) − φ(startpoint), making path parametrization unnecessary
- A vector field is conservative if and only if its line integral around every closed curve is zero; in 2D on simply-connected domains, the test ∂P/∂y = ∂Q/∂x is necessary and sufficient
- The notation P dx + Q dy represents a differential 1-form; it is exact (equals dφ) precisely when the corresponding vector field is conservative
Pitfalls
-
Forgetting ds = |r'(t)| dt for scalar integrals. In scalar line integrals ∫_C f ds, the arc-length element ds uses the magnitude of r'(t). Using r'(t) without the absolute value (as in vector integrals) gives the wrong answer.
-
Assuming a field is conservative just because ∂P/∂y = ∂Q/∂x. The cross-partial equality is sufficient only on simply-connected domains. On domains with holes (like an annulus), a field can pass the cross-partial test yet still have nonzero circulation around the hole — the classic counterexample is ⟨−y, x⟩/(x² + y²).
-
Confusing scalar and vector line integral notation. ∫_C f ds (scalar) does not depend on orientation, while ∫_C F · dr (vector) flips sign when the curve is reversed. Mixing up ds = |r'(t)| dt with dr = r'(t) dt is a common source of algebraic errors.
-
Using FTLI on non-conservative fields. The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals only applies when F = ∇φ. Always verify conservativity (via the cross-partial test on a simply-connected domain, or by finding a potential φ) before using the endpoint formula φ(B) − φ(A).
-
Neglecting to check orientation when choosing a parametrization. The line integral ∫_C F · dr depends on direction. If the problem specifies a particular orientation and your parametrization produces the opposite direction, the result will have the wrong sign. Always verify your parametrization matches the specified orientation.
Next Steps
Move on to 07-06 — Green's Theorem to discover the beautiful relationship between line integrals around closed curves and double integrals over the enclosed region — the 2D analog of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and a gateway to the deeper theorems of vector calculus.