08-09 — Diagonalisation
Phase: 8 — Linear Algebra (Rigorous) Subject: 08-09 Prerequisites: 08-08 — Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Next subject: 08-10 — Symmetric Matrices and the Spectral Theorem
Learning Objectives
By the end of this subject, you will be able to:
- Determine whether a matrix is diagonalizable by checking that geometric multiplicity equals algebraic multiplicity for all eigenvalues
- Diagonalize a matrix A by constructing P (eigenvectors) and D (eigenvalues) such that A = PDP⁻¹
- Compute powers of diagonalizable matrices efficiently using A^k = P D^k P⁻¹
- Apply diagonalization to solve systems of first-order linear differential equations and analyze dynamical systems
- Understand the role of similarity transformations and relate diagonalization to change-of-basis operations
Core Content
1. When Is a Matrix Diagonalizable?
An n × n matrix A is diagonalizable if it is similar to a diagonal matrix:
$A = P D P⁻¹ $
where D = diag(λ₁, ..., λ_n) and columns of P are corresponding eigenvectors.
CRITICAL — Foundational: Diagonalization $A = PDP⁻¹$ is the 'holy grail' — it reveals a complex transformation is just independent scaling along eigen-directions. Enables fast powers $A^k = PD^kP⁻¹$ and solves differential equations.
Theorem (Diagonalizability Criterion): A is diagonalizable if and only if: - The characteristic polynomial splits over the field (for us, usually R or C) - GM(λ) = AM(λ) for every eigenvalue λ
Equivalently: A has n linearly independent eigenvectors.
Sufficient conditions for diagonalizability: 1. A has n DISTINCT eigenvalues (strongest simple condition — automatically diagonalizable)
Common Pitfall: Distinct eigenvalues is SUFFICIENT but NOT necessary. Identity matrix has λ=1 repeated but is diagonal. Conversely, repeated eigenvalues may signal defectiveness — always check GM = AM. 2. A is symmetric (guarantees orthogonal diagonalization over R) 3. A is normal (A A^T = A^T A) over C
Common non-diagonalizable (defective) case:
$A = [λ 1] (Jordan block)
[0 λ]
$
λ has AM = 2 but GM = 1. Only one eigenvector.
Checking diagonalizability algorithmically: 1. Find all eigenvalues (roots of characteristic polynomial) 2. For each eigenvalue λ, compute GM = n − rank(A − λI) 3. Compare GM with AM (the multiplicity as a root) 4. Diagonalizable iff GM = AM for all λ
2. The Diagonalization Process
Step-by-step diagonalization of A:
Step 1: Find eigenvalues λ₁, ..., λ_n by solving det(A − λI) = 0.
Step 2: For each eigenvalue λ, find a BASIS of the eigenspace E_λ = N(A − λI).
Step 3: Concatenate all eigenvectors as columns of P.
Step 4: Form D with eigenvalues on the diagonal in the SAME ORDER as the eigenvectors in P.
Step 5: Verify P is invertible (columns are independent; if not, A is not diagonalizable).
Step 6: Compute P⁻¹ (or just verify PDP⁻¹ = A).
Example:
$A = [1 2]
[2 1]
$
Eigenvalues: det[1−λ 2; 2 1−λ] = (1−λ)² − 4 = λ² − 2λ − 3 = (λ−3)(λ+1) → λ = 3, −1.
λ = 3: A−3I = [−2 2; 2 −2] → x₁ = x₂ → eigenvector (1, 1). λ = −1: A+I = [2 2; 2 2] → x₁ = −x₂ → eigenvector (1, −1).
$P = [1 1] D = [3 0] P⁻¹ = [1/2 1/2]
[1 -1] [0 -1] [1/2 -1/2]
$
Check: PDP⁻¹ = [1 1; 1 −1][3 0; 0 −1][1/2 1/2; 1/2 −1/2] = [3 −1; 3 1][1/2 1/2; 1/2 −1/2] = [1 2; 2 1] = A. ✓
3. Powers of Diagonalizable Matrices
If A = PDP⁻¹, then:
$A^k = (PDP⁻¹)(PDP⁻¹)...(PDP⁻¹) = P D^k P⁻¹ $
where D^k = diag(λ₁^k, λ₂^k, ..., λ_n^k).
This reduces computing A^k (O(k n³) directly) to O(n³) for diagonalization + O(n log k) for computing powers.
Example: For A = [1 2; 2 1] above:
$A¹⁰⁰ = P [3¹⁰⁰ 0; 0 (−1)¹⁰⁰] P⁻¹
= P [3¹⁰⁰ 0; 0 1] P⁻¹
= [1 1; 1 −1] [3¹⁰⁰ 0; 0 1] [1/2 1/2; 1/2 −1/2]
= [(3¹⁰⁰+1)/2 (3¹⁰⁰−1)/2; (3¹⁰⁰−1)/2 (3¹⁰⁰+1)/2]
$
Long-term behavior: As k → ∞, the behavior is dominated by the eigenvalue of largest magnitude: - If |λ_max| < 1, A^k → 0 - If |λ_max| > 1, A^k diverges - If |λ_max| = 1, behavior depends on that eigenvalue
4. Diagonalization via Change of Basis
Diagonalization is fundamentally a change-of-basis operation. In the eigenbasis B, the linear transformation T(x) = Ax becomes the diagonal matrix D:
[T]_B = P⁻¹ A P = D
where P = P_{E←B} is the change-of-basis matrix from B to the standard basis E (its columns are the B-basis vectors in E-coordinates).
Geometric interpretation: In the eigenbasis, the transformation acts by simply scaling each coordinate independently. The "complicated" matrix A is just a diagonal scaling viewed from the "wrong" coordinate system.
5. Application: Systems of Differential Equations
Consider the system: dx/dt = A x, where x(t) ∈ R^n.
If A = PDP⁻¹, let y = P⁻¹ x. Then dy/dt = P⁻¹ dx/dt = P⁻¹ A x = P⁻¹ A P y = D y.
Since D is diagonal, the system decouples:
dy_i/dt = λ_i y_i → y_i(t) = y_i(0) e^{λ_i t}
Transforming back: x(t) = P y(t) = Σ c_i e^{λ_i t} v_i, where v_i are eigenvectors.
Example — Predator-Prey model: dx/dt = x + 2y, dy/dt = 2x + y. Matrix: A = [1 2; 2 1] (same as above).
Eigenvalues: 3, −1. Eigenvectors: (1,1), (1,−1).
General solution: x(t) = c₁ e^{3t} (1,1) + c₂ e^{−t} (1,−1) = (c₁ e^{3t} + c₂ e^{−t}, c₁ e^{3t} − c₂ e^{−t})
Phase portrait analysis: - λ = 3 > 0: unstable direction (e^{3t} grows) along (1,1) - λ = −1 < 0: stable direction (e^{−t} decays) along (1,−1) - Origin is a saddle point
6. Application: Markov Chains (Discrete Dynamics)
x_{k+1} = A x_k. If A is diagonalizable: x_k = A^k x₀ = P D^k P⁻¹ x₀.
The steady state (if it exists) corresponds to the eigenvector for λ = 1.
Example: A = [0.9 0.2; 0.1 0.8] (transition matrix).
Eigenvalues: λ₁ = 1 (eigenvector (2/3, 1/3) normalized), λ₂ = 0.7. As k → ∞: D^k → diag(1, 0), so x_∞ = P diag(1,0) P⁻¹ x₀ = projection onto the λ=1 eigenspace.
Key Terms
- 08 09 Diagonalisation
- Application: Markov Chains (Discrete Dynamics)
- Application: Systems of Differential Equations
- Correct: A) Always diagonalizable
- Correct: B) P D^100 P⁻¹
- Correct: B) P D⁻¹ P⁻¹
- Correct: B) P must be invertible
- Correct: B) The eigenvectors of A
- Correct: B) The geometric multiplicity of λ
- Correct: B) The same eigenvalues
- Correct: B) λ = 1
- Correct: C) A saddle point
Worked Examples
Example 1: Complete Diagonalization
Problem: Diagonalize A = [5 −3; 2 0] and compute A¹⁰.
Solution:
Step 1: det(A−λI) = det[5−λ −3; 2 −λ] = (5−λ)(−λ) − (−3)(2) = −5λ + λ² + 6 = λ² − 5λ + 6 = (λ−2)(λ−3).
λ = 2, 3 (distinct → automatically diagonalizable).
Step 2: λ = 2: A−2I = [3 −3; 2 −2] → 3x₁−3x₂=0 → x₁=x₂. Eigenvector: (1, 1). λ = 3: A−3I = [2 −3; 2 −3] → 2x₁−3x₂=0 → x₁ = (3/2)x₂. Choose x₂ = 2: eigenvector (3, 2).
Step 3-4:
$P = [1 3] D = [2 0]
[1 2] [0 3]
$
P⁻¹ = [−2 3; 1 −1]. (Check: P P⁻¹ = I. ✓)
Step 5: A¹⁰ = P D¹⁰ P⁻¹ = [1 3; 1 2] [2¹⁰ 0; 0 3¹⁰] [−2 3; 1 −1]. = [1 3; 1 2] [−2·2¹⁰ 3·2¹⁰; 3¹⁰ −3¹⁰] (not fully expanded — but the pattern is clear).
Example 2: Non-Diagonalizable Matrix
Problem: Show A = [1 1; 0 1] is NOT diagonalizable.
Solution: det(A−λI) = (1−λ)² = 0 → λ = 1, AM = 2. A−I = [0 1; 0 0], rank = 1. GM = 2 − 1 = 1 < 2 = AM. Not enough independent eigenvectors → NOT diagonalizable.
If we try to diagonalize: the only eigenvector is (1, 0) (up to scaling). We can't form an invertible P with only one eigenvector direction.
What to do instead: Jordan canonical form: A = [1 1; 0 1] is already in Jordan form.
Example 3: Differential Equation System
Problem: Solve dx/dt = 2x + y, dy/dt = x + 2y with x(0) = 1, y(0) = 0.
Solution: A = [2 1; 1 2].
Eigenvalues: det[2−λ 1; 1 2−λ] = (2−λ)² − 1 = λ² − 4λ + 3 = (λ−1)(λ−3). λ = 1, 3.
λ = 1: A−I = [1 1; 1 1] → x₁ = −x₂. Eigenvector: (−1, 1) or normalized: (1, −1). λ = 3: A−3I = [−1 1; 1 −1] → x₁ = x₂. Eigenvector: (1, 1).
General solution: [x; y] = c₁ e^t [1; −1] + c₂ e^{3t} [1; 1].
Apply initial condition: [1; 0] = c₁[1; −1] + c₂[1; 1] = [c₁+c₂; −c₁+c₂]. → c₁ + c₂ = 1, −c₁ + c₂ = 0 → c₁ = c₂ = 1/2.
x(t) = (1/2)e^t + (1/2)e^{3t}, y(t) = −(1/2)e^t + (1/2)e^{3t}.
Example 4: Power Computation via Diagonalization
Problem: Compute A⁵ for A = [0 1; 1 1] (Fibonacci matrix).
Solution: Eigenvalues: det[−λ 1; 1 1−λ] = −λ(1−λ) − 1 = λ² − λ − 1 = 0. λ = (1±√5)/2 = φ ≈ 1.618, ψ ≈ −0.618 (where φ is the golden ratio, ψ = 1−φ = −1/φ).
Eigenvectors: For φ: (1, φ). For ψ: (1, ψ).
$P = [1 1] D = [φ 0] P⁻¹ = [φ/(φ−ψ) −1/(φ−ψ)]
[φ ψ] [0 ψ] [−ψ/(φ−ψ) 1/(φ−ψ)]
$
Note φ−ψ = √5.
A⁵ = P D⁵ P⁻¹. The (1,1) entry (related to Fibonacci numbers) = (φ⁵ − ψ⁵)/√5. φ⁵ ≈ 11.090, ψ⁵ ≈ −0.090. So A⁵ ≈ [5 8; 8 13] — indeed these are consecutive Fibonacci numbers: F₅=5, F₆=8, F₇=13.
Practice Problems
(Answers are below. Try each problem before checking.)
Problem 1: Diagonalize A = [3 1; 0 2] if possible.
Problem 2: Determine whether A = [2 1 0; 0 2 1; 0 0 2] is diagonalizable.
Problem 3: For A = [0 −1; 1 0], is A diagonalizable over R? Over C?
Problem 4: Solve dx/dt = 3x, dy/dt = x + 2y, dz/dt = y − z.
Problem 5: If A = PDP⁻¹, show that A^k = P D^k P⁻¹ by induction.
Problem 6: Diagonalize A = [4 2; 2 1] and compute the limit of A^k as k → ∞ (if it exists).
Problem 7: Find a matrix P that diagonalizes A = [1 2 0; 0 3 0; 0 0 2].
Answers (click to expand)
**Problem 1:** Triangular → eigenvalues on diagonal: 3, 2. Distinct → diagonalizable. λ = 3: A−3I = [0 1; 0 −1] → x₂=0, x₁ free → (1, 0). λ = 2: A−2I = [1 1; 0 0] → x₁+x₂=0 → (1, −1). P = [1 1; 0 −1], D = [3 0; 0 2]. P⁻¹ = [1 1; 0 −1]. Check: PDP⁻¹ = A. ✓ **Problem 2:** Upper triangular with 2 on diagonal. λ = 2, AM = 3. A−2I = [0 1 0; 0 0 1; 0 0 0]. rank = 2 (pivots in cols 2,3). GM = 3 − 2 = 1 < 3 = AM. NOT diagonalizable. It's a 3×3 Jordan block. **Problem 3:** Over R: det(A−λI) = λ² + 1 = 0 has no real roots. NOT diagonalizable over R. Over C: λ = ±i (distinct). Diagonalizable over C: P = [1 1; i −i], D = [i 0; 0 −i]. A represents 90° rotation; over C it's just scaling by ±i. The geometric fact that a rotation has no real eigenvectors matches the algebraic fact that p(λ) has no real roots. **Problem 4:** The coefficient matrix is triangular: [3 0 0; 1 2 0; 0 1 −1]. Eigenvalues: 3, 2, −1 (distinct → diagonalizable). dx/dt = 3x → x(t) = c₁ e^{3t} dy/dt = x + 2y → dy/dt − 2y = c₁ e^{3t}. Integrating factor: e^{−2t}. d/dt(ye^{−2t}) = c₁ e^t → y e^{−2t} = c₁ e^t + c₂ → y = c₁ e^{3t} + c₂ e^{2t}. dz/dt = y − z → dz/dt + z = c₁ e^{3t} + c₂ e^{2t}. IF: e^t. d/dt(z e^t) = c₁ e^{4t} + c₂ e^{3t}. z e^t = (c₁/4)e^{4t} + (c₂/3)e^{3t} + c₃ → z = (c₁/4)e^{3t} + (c₂/3)e^{2t} + c₃ e^{−t}. General solution pattern: each eigenvalue contributes its exponential times an eigenvector component. **Problem 5:** Base case k=1: A = PDP⁻¹ holds. Assume A^k = P D^k P⁻¹. A^{k+1} = A A^k = (PDP⁻¹)(P D^k P⁻¹) = P D (P⁻¹P) D^k P⁻¹ = P D D^k P⁻¹ = P D^{k+1} P⁻¹. ✓ **Problem 6:** det(A−λI) = det[4−λ 2; 2 1−λ] = (4−λ)(1−λ) − 4 = λ² − 5λ + 4 − 4 = λ² − 5λ = λ(λ−5). λ = 0, 5. λ=0: A = [4 2; 2 1] → 4x₁+2x₂=0 → x₂=−2x₁. Eigenvector: (1, −2). λ=5: A−5I = [−1 2; 2 −4] → −x₁+2x₂=0 → x₁=2x₂. Eigenvector: (2, 1). P = [1 2; −2 1], D = [0 0; 0 5], P⁻¹ = [1/5 −2/5; 2/5 1/5]. A^k = P D^k P⁻¹ = P [0 0; 0 5^k] P⁻¹. As k→∞: D^k → diag(0, ∞) unless 5^k is considered. Actually: A^k = 5^k P [0 0; 0 1] P⁻¹? No — D^k = [0 0; 0 5^k]. Let's compute: P D^k P⁻¹ = [1 2; −2 1][0 0; 0 5^k][1/5 −2/5; 2/5 1/5] = [0 2·5^k; 0 1·5^k] [1/5 −2/5; 2/5 1/5] = [4·5^k/5 2·5^k/5; 2·5^k/5 1·5^k/5] = 5^{k-1} [4 2; 2 1]. As k→∞, this diverges (|λ_max| = 5 > 1). The entries grow without bound. **Problem 7:** Block triangular. Eigenvalues: λ=1 (1st block), λ=3,2 (2nd block diagonal). Distinct → diagonalizable. For λ=1: A−I = [0 2 0; 0 2 0; 0 0 1]. x₂=0, z=0, x₁ free → (1, 0, 0). For λ=3: A−3I = [−2 2 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 −1]. x₁=x₂, z=0 → (1, 1, 0). For λ=2: A−2I = [−1 2 0; 0 1 0; 0 0 0]. −x₁+2x₂=0 → x₁=2x₂, z free. For x₂=1, x₁=2, z=1 → (2, 1, 1). Or simpler: x₂=1, x₁=2, z=0... but need independent. Let's do: (−x₁+2x₂=0, x₂=0) → x₁=0, z free → (0, 0, 1) — wait, that's in N(A−2I). Let me redo. A−2I = [−1 2 0; 0 1 0; 0 0 0]. Row 2: x₂=0. Row 1: −x₁+0=0 → x₁=0. z free. So eigenvector: (0, 0, 1). P = [1 1 0; 0 1 0; 0 0 1], D = diag(1, 3, 2).Summary
- A matrix is diagonalizable (A = PDP⁻¹) iff it has n linearly independent eigenvectors; equivalently, GM = AM for every eigenvalue — distinct eigenvalues guarantee diagonalizability
- The diagonalization process: find eigenvalues → find eigenbases → assemble P from eigenvectors and D from eigenvalues in matching order → verify P is invertible
- Powers simplify dramatically: A^k = P D^k P⁻¹ where D^k just raises each diagonal entry to the k-th power; the long-term behavior is governed by the dominant eigenvalue
- Systems of linear ODEs dx/dt = Ax decouple in the eigenbasis: each coordinate independently follows dy_i/dt = λ_i y_i → y_i(t) = c_i e^{λ_i t}
- Diagonalization is a change-of-basis operation: A is a diagonal scaling viewed from the standard basis; switching to the eigenbasis reveals the simple nature of the transformation
Pitfalls
-
Assuming distinct eigenvalues is necessary for diagonalizability. Distinct eigenvalues is a SUFFICIENT condition, not a necessary one. The identity matrix has a single repeated eigenvalue but is diagonal (trivially diagonalizable). Always check GM = AM for repeated eigenvalues.
-
Putting eigenvalues in the wrong order. In A = PDP⁻¹, the i-th column of P is the eigenvector corresponding to the i-th diagonal entry of D. If eigenvalues and eigenvectors are misaligned, the decomposition fails. Always match orders carefully.
-
Forgetting to verify that P is invertible. If the eigenvectors assembled in P are linearly dependent, P is singular and A is not diagonalizable. This happens exactly when some eigenvalue has GM < AM — a quick check of det(P) ≠ 0 confirms diagnolizability.
-
Attempting to diagonalize over R when eigenvalues are complex. A real matrix with complex eigenvalues (like a rotation) may be diagonalizable over C but not over R. The diagonalization A = PDP⁻¹ with real P requires real eigenvalues. Over R, the best you can do for complex eigenvalues is block-diagonal real canonical form.
-
Confusing similarity (P⁻¹AP) with congruence (P^T AP). Diagonalization uses similarity transformations, which preserve eigenvalues. Congruence transformations preserve inertia (signs of eigenvalues) but NOT the eigenvalues themselves. Do not use P^T when you need P⁻¹.
Quiz
Answer each question, then read the explanation for your choice.
Q1: An n × n matrix with n distinct eigenvalues is:
A) Always diagonalizable B) Sometimes diagonalizable C) Never diagonalizable D) Always singular
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: A) Always diagonalizable** Eigenvectors for distinct eigenvalues are linearly independent. With n distinct eigenvalues, we get n independent eigenvectors → diagonalizable. - A) ✓ Correct. Distinct eigenvalues is a sufficient condition. - B, C) Wrong. - D) Only if 0 is among the eigenvalues.Q2: In A = PDP⁻¹, the columns of P are:
A) The eigenvalues of A B) The eigenvectors of A C) The diagonal entries of A D) The rows of D
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: B) The eigenvectors of A** AP = PD, so column j of P is multiplied by d_jj. Each column of P is an eigenvector with the corresponding eigenvalue in D. - A) Eigenvalues are in D, not P. - B) ✓ Correct. P = [v₁ v₂ ... v_n]. - C) Not related. - D) D is diagonal, rows = columns = eigenvalues.Q2b: What must be true about P for diagonalization to work?
A) P must be symmetric B) P must be invertible C) P must be orthogonal D) P must be diagonal
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: B) P must be invertible** We need P⁻¹ to exist so that A = PDP⁻¹ is valid. If P isn't invertible, the eigenvectors are dependent and A isn't diagonalizable. - A) Symmetry not required. - B) ✓ Correct. P⁻¹ must exist. - C) Orthogonality is a bonus (symmetric matrices), not required. - D) If P is diagonal, A is already diagonal (trivial).Q3: A^100 for a diagonalizable matrix can be computed as:
A) 100·A B) P D^100 P⁻¹ C) D^100 D) (P D P⁻¹)^100
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: B) P D^100 P⁻¹** A^k = P D^k P⁻¹ by induction. D^100 is easy: just raise each diagonal entry λ_i to the 100th power. - A) Only if A is a scalar multiple of identity. - B) ✓ Correct. The power reduces to diagonal powers. - C) Ignores the basis transformations P and P⁻¹. - D) This is true by definition (A = PDP⁻¹), but B is the SIMPLIFIED computation.Q4: For dx/dt = Ax, the solution involves:
A) cos and sin of eigenvalues B) Exponentials e^{λt} of eigenvalues C) Polynomials in t D) All of the above, depending on A
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: D) All of the above, depending on A** Real distinct eigenvalues → pure exponentials e^{λt}. Complex eigenvalues → sines and cosines (via Euler's formula). Repeated eigenvalues (defective) → polynomial factors t^k e^{λt}. - A, B, C) Each is possible for different matrix types. - D) ✓ Correct. The form depends on the eigenvalue structure.Q5: A shear matrix [1 1; 0 1] is NOT diagonalizable because:
A) It has complex eigenvalues B) It has only one eigenvalue C) GM < AM for its eigenvalue D) It is singular
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: C) GM < AM for its eigenvalue** λ = 1, AM = 2. But A−I = [0 1; 0 0] has rank 1, so GM = 1 < 2. Not enough eigenvectors. - A) Eigenvalues are real (λ=1). - B) Having one eigenvalue doesn't prevent diagonalization (identity matrix is diagonal). - C) ✓ Correct. GM=1 < AM=2 → defective. - D) det = 1, not singular.Q6: If A = PDP⁻¹, then A⁻¹ (when it exists) equals:
A) P⁻¹ D⁻¹ P B) P D⁻¹ P⁻¹ C) D⁻¹ D) P D P⁻¹
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: B) P D⁻¹ P⁻¹** (A⁻¹) = (PDP⁻¹)⁻¹ = (P⁻¹)⁻¹ D⁻¹ P⁻¹ = P D⁻¹ P⁻¹. D⁻¹ just inverts each diagonal entry (1/λ_i). - A) Wrong order — should be P D⁻¹ P⁻¹. - B) ✓ Correct. - C) Ignores basis change. - D) That's A itself.Q7: For the system dx/dt = 2x, dy/dt = −3y, the equilibrium at (0,0) is:
A) A stable node B) An unstable node C) A saddle point D) A center
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: C) A saddle point** Eigenvalues: 2 > 0 (unstable direction along x-axis), −3 < 0 (stable direction along y-axis). Mixed signs → saddle. - A) Both eigenvalues negative → stable node. - B) Both positive → unstable node. - C) ✓ Correct. Mixed signs → saddle. - D) Pure imaginary eigenvalues → center.Q8: In the context of Markov chains with transition matrix A, the steady-state distribution corresponds to the eigenvector for:
A) λ = 0 B) λ = 1 C) The largest eigenvalue in magnitude D) The smallest eigenvalue
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: B) λ = 1** A stochastic matrix always has λ = 1 as an eigenvalue (rows sum to 1, so (1,1,...,1) is a left eigenvector). The steady state π satisfies πA = π, so it's the eigenvector for λ = 1. - A) Zero eigenvalue would annihilate the state. - B) ✓ Correct. λ = 1 is the steady-state eigenvalue. - C) For powers, the dominant |λ| governs growth, not steady state. - D) Smallest eigenvalue doesn't characterize steady state.Q9: The dimension of the solution space for (A − λI)x = 0 is called:
A) The algebraic multiplicity of λ B) The geometric multiplicity of λ C) The rank of λ D) The nullity of A
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: B) The geometric multiplicity of λ** dim(E_λ) = dim(N(A − λI)) = GM of λ. - A) AM is the exponent in the characteristic polynomial. - B) ✓ Correct. GM = dim(eigenspace). - C) Rank is a property of the matrix, not λ. - D) Nullity of A is dim(N(A)), which is the GM of λ=0.Q10: Similar matrices have:
A) The same eigenvectors B) The same eigenvalues C) The same entries D) The same rank but different eigenvalues
Answer and Explanations
**Correct: B) The same eigenvalues** Similar matrices (B = P⁻¹AP) have the same characteristic polynomial and hence the same eigenvalues. But eigenvectors transform: v is eigenvector of A → P⁻¹v is eigenvector of B. - A) Eigenvectors change under similarity. - B) ✓ Correct. Eigenvalues are similarity invariants. - C) Entries change — diagonalization is similarity to a diagonal matrix. - D) Similar matrices have the same eigenvalues.Next Steps
Move on to 08-10 — Symmetric Matrices and the Spectral Theorem to learn the crowning result of linear algebra: every real symmetric matrix is orthogonally diagonalizable with real eigenvalues, leading to the spectral theorem, quadratic forms, and positive definiteness.